The Poisonwood Bible, written by Barbara Kingsolver, is certainly one of the most intriguing novels we have read thus far. It discusses the Congo and the culture there in a way no other story has that we have read and it is very though provoking because of this. With the story having many different narrators, there is always a different perspective offered to the reader that is refreshing and quirky in their own respective manner. Although all of the narrators provide interesting stories and angles of what is going on in their lives while living in the Congo, my favorite narrator is Rachel. Rachel is the eldest of the daughters of the Price family and she is a sassy teenager that is quite displeased with moving to the Congo. She demonstrates this frustration through the judgements she makes and the observations she describes to the reader. It is made clear early on by Kingsolver that Rachel has no interest in getting comfortable while living in the Congo. She is represented as a stereotypical teenage girl that wants everything her way. She is quick to judge people, especially about things such as clothing and nudity because she has strong opinions on these things. However, what I find most interesting about Rachel is how her narrative changes throughout the book. As time goes on, she becomes more involved and intrigued with what is happening around her. She eventually brings down the wall of teen annoyance and welcomes new ideas and people into her bubble. I think this will only continue as time goes on in the novel. To me, Rachel has the most mature outlook on life since she is the eldest daughter, yet she is still developing her opinions and ideas and just starting to get involved with everything like wanting to read the newspaper and learn about what events are taking place around the world. I definitely think her narrative will continue to become more and more interesting as she continues to become curious about the world she lives in.
The fact that this novel is narrated by only women and children speaks volumes to the message the author is trying to send out. This allows the reader to see life in the Congo from the female perspective and not the white, male perspective that is most common. Kingsolver's narratives allow the reader to connect to the story in a more realistic way because everyone was a child once and can understand the thoughts and feelings being expressed by the children in their narratives. The fact that Nathan Price has no narrative shows the reader that his story is not the focal point of the novel, it is about how the children and his wife are dealing with living in the Congo more than it is about Nathan himself. Also, even though Nathan does not have a narrative, his story is still told through others which demonstrates that men in power like him do not even need their own narrative to have their story told because others will do it for them. This novel is certainly unlike the previous books we read that took place in the Congo, however, it is by far my favorite. I find it very refreshing to read a novel from the perspectives of only women, especially regarding a topic as important and interesting as this.
I love this post. It's so insightful and it tells a lot about Rachel. I think it could have been split up into more paragraphs. I can tell you feel for Rachel, as the simple teenager who just didn't want to move. It makes her seem more relatable, the way you talk about her, and I like that. Your second paragraph is clear and makes sense. I think it could have been split up also. It's good you contrast Nathan's perspective, it adds to the post. Overall a swell post!
ReplyDeleteI love this post. I think that you introduce Rachel in a really simple way, instead of trying to present her as more complex than she may actually be. I agree that she has become more interested in the world around her as she grows, and I think it's really interesting how that development mixes with her sass and mild selfishness. I'd be interested to hear what you think about Rachel's relationships with the people around her. I also love you you talk about how it's easier to relate to the narratives when they're children's voices, because everyone was a child once. Great job!
ReplyDeleteThis is a really well done post. I like that you don't just retell Rachel's parts in the novel, but explain with each example why those aspects make her such an interesting character. I especially like how part of why Rachel is your favorite is because of the expectations you now have for the growth of her character yet to happen, because after you point it out I agree that she does seem late in development, but could have the most interesting change. During your argument for the importance of perspectives, I really like how you point out that everyone can relate to a childs voice, because usually if a novel is written from the point of view of a child, it is marketed toward children. However, using a child's voice in a novel is something everyone at some point could connect to. Very well done!
ReplyDelete