Wednesday, April 12, 2017

Not tragic, not a hero

Aristotle believed in tragic heroes. These people are not saviors who help all and do no harm, living happily ever after; in fact, to Aristotle tragic heroes are imperfect beings who come to a deadly end. Okonwko, in Things Fall Apart, fits some of Aristotle's requirements, but not all. Even with all of Aristotle's ideas, Okonkwo does not seem remotely like a hero at all, not even a tragic one.

Aristotle's first three ideas on being a tragic hero in theory fit Okonkwo, however one should look at how he got to where he was. A tragic hero needs to be a character of noble stature and greatness. Yes, Okonkwo is revered in his village, but is because he is the best at brutally fighting people to prove his strength. Secondly, the hero is pre-eminently great, but not  perfect. I would not even go as far to say that Okonkwo is great. He beats his wife and children and cannot control his nasty temper. He even tries to shoot one wife! I do not see myself to be anything like Okonkwo at all and cannot identify with him. Okonwo's downfall is his fault. He kills himself, that is entirely his choice. Although this fits the requirement, in this case I believe it was a coward's way out.

The last three basic ideas of being a tragic hero do not apply to Okonkwo. He killed many people and went against village advice, not to mention he killed himself before he was caught so we'll never know if the punishment exceeds the crime. I do believe that his suicide was pure loss. If he had stayed alive to explain why he did what he did, then there would have been some gain and discovery, but he did not. After reading about Okonkwo's fate, I was a bit shocked and very upset with the outcome. Suicide is a very touchy subject and it hurt me to realize that none of the villagers could touch Okonkwo's body because he committed such a sin. It's arguable that the suicide was prideful because he would not be killed by anyone, but himself, however, I think he would have had the villager's support and would not have even been killed.

Though it may seem harsh, Okonwko was not a hero of any kind. His actions override any sensible things he ever did. I simply could not get over his awful temper that drove him to do unthinkable things. And if a hero has confidence, constantly doubting one's strength and killing a boy due to being afraid of what other's think, is not it. Okonkwo was just another character that tried to help himself and made very bad choices.

3 comments:

  1. This is a very interesting post. I agree with the basics of what you're saying, but I'm not sure that Okonkwo's suicide was a "cowardly" way out. I like the way you organized this and connected the post your own personal feelings about being unable to relate to Okonkwo. I think some of your claims could use a bit more support from the text, but other than that, this is a good post.

    ReplyDelete
  2. This post is definitely in your voice, which is always really important to capture in semi-informal writing. I love how you show how it can be interpreted that Okonkwo fits the criteria of a tragic hero, but is instead too violent and selfish to truly be the Aristotle's trope. The last sentence in the third paragraph makes an assertion that I never thought about, and now that you mention it, I couldn't agree more! Okonkwo assumed certain actions his tribe would take, and acted permanantly upon these thoughts, even though his people probably would have found some way to save him. You reference a lot of specific instances, and these help your argument greatly. Amazing job!

    ReplyDelete
  3. It's often difficult to respond to a question of "how does this character fit this criteria" with "actually, he doesn't". You did a very good job of turning the prompt on its head and making a strong claim. I think some more textual evidence (direct quotes, etc.) could have helped strengthen your claim even further, as well as your opinion on some of his other, smaller downfalls. Was he responsible for his exile from Umuofia, for example? Still, your post makes a very strong argument and leaves a lot of potential for interesting discussion, which we're already seeing in the comments. Nice job!

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.